<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Creative Bump</title>
	<link>http://www.creativebump.com</link>
	<description>Satisfying Gear and Tech Lust For Creatives</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on StarrLabs Ztar Z7-s MIDI Controller Instrument - Sneak Preview by Ponch</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/10/08/starrlabs-ztar-z7-s-midi-controller-instrument-sneak-preview/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/10/08/starrlabs-ztar-z7-s-midi-controller-instrument-sneak-preview/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Great stuff my friend!! wow I dig that Ztar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff my friend!! wow I dig that Ztar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Features That Google Should Implement Into Gmail by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/10/05/10-features-that-google-should-implement-into-gmail/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/10/05/10-features-that-google-should-implement-into-gmail/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Gmail is great, but I personally find that it is no replacement for a proper email client sitting on your OS. Programs like Apple Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook 2007 are much more powerful, include all of the things you want and also provide powerful OS integration—meaning you don't need to open your browser to know if you've got Mail—your application will let you know if you just leave it running. As far as 'Webmail' goes, Gmail is probably the best of its breed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail is great, but I personally find that it is no replacement for a proper email client sitting on your OS. Programs like Apple Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook 2007 are much more powerful, include all of the things you want and also provide powerful OS integration—meaning you don&#8217;t need to open your browser to know if you&#8217;ve got Mail—your application will let you know if you just leave it running. As far as &#8216;Webmail&#8217; goes, Gmail is probably the best of its breed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dell Release New XPS M1730 Laptop - I dub &#8220;The Ugly Brute&#8221; by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/27/dell-release-new-xps-m1730-laptop-i-dub-it-the-ugly-brute/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/27/dell-release-new-xps-m1730-laptop-i-dub-it-the-ugly-brute/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>That is so ugly :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is so ugly <img src='http://www.creativebump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Pages - The New eBook Reader? by Myles de Bastion</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/29/digital-pages-the-new-ebook-reader/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles de Bastion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/29/digital-pages-the-new-ebook-reader/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Technology moves so fast, I had forgotten about the iBook!

I agree, we should just keep using the name "books" and avoid the need to label everything for the next generation.

Good observations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology moves so fast, I had forgotten about the iBook!</p>
<p>I agree, we should just keep using the name &#8220;books&#8221; and avoid the need to label everything for the next generation.</p>
<p>Good observations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Pages - The New eBook Reader? by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/29/digital-pages-the-new-ebook-reader/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/29/digital-pages-the-new-ebook-reader/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hey Myles, thanks for mentioning my post :)

iBook is an older Apple product, that preceded the MacBook. I think you are right, the term eBook suffers an image problem right now. There are a lot of cheap "eBooks" out there, mostly featuring secret formulas on getting rich in a week and all of that nonsense—I don't think this helps the eBooks image. In-fact I don't think there should be a term eBook at all. Well.. what are we going to call digital books then? Why not simply "book"? After all, we don't listen to emusic on our iPods, we listen to music. In the future, we're gonna be reading books on our iPages, not ebooks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Myles, thanks for mentioning my post <img src='http://www.creativebump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>iBook is an older Apple product, that preceded the MacBook. I think you are right, the term eBook suffers an image problem right now. There are a lot of cheap &#8220;eBooks&#8221; out there, mostly featuring secret formulas on getting rich in a week and all of that nonsense—I don&#8217;t think this helps the eBooks image. In-fact I don&#8217;t think there should be a term eBook at all. Well.. what are we going to call digital books then? Why not simply &#8220;book&#8221;? After all, we don&#8217;t listen to emusic on our iPods, we listen to music. In the future, we&#8217;re gonna be reading books on our iPages, not ebooks <img src='http://www.creativebump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FujiFilm F30 - The Camera I Always Take With Me by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback Myles.

If I was to take shots like these: http://blogs.msdn.com/mswanson/articles/wallpaper.aspx (Mike Swanson's macro nature wallpaper images) and want really crisp 1920 x 1200 pixel shots - do I definately need a professional lens or are high end consumer cameras these days capable of these shots?

Also.. please take example macro shots for your review :) I'd like to see how it performs. Looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback Myles.</p>
<p>If I was to take shots like these: <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mswanson/articles/wallpaper.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/mswanson/articles/wallpaper.aspx</a> (Mike Swanson&#8217;s macro nature wallpaper images) and want really crisp 1920 x 1200 pixel shots - do I definately need a professional lens or are high end consumer cameras these days capable of these shots?</p>
<p>Also.. please take example macro shots for your review <img src='http://www.creativebump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;d like to see how it performs. Looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FujiFilm F30 - The Camera I Always Take With Me by Myles de Bastion</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles de Bastion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Some very good questions Dmitry,

I am actually preparing a proper review of the digital camera that I use (FujiFilm F30) and it can indeed get good Macro shots.  
Without going into too much detail fo r the comments section,  I can tell you that the important features you should be looking for today in a digital camera are image stabilization and low light sensitivity (ISO, but be careful as some brands favor large ISO settings that produce a lot of noise in an image and then they apply excessive noise reduction processing in-camera which results in a "smeary" image that lacks detail).

Also another buzz word and "must have" function these days is 'Face Detection", a clever system whereby the camera can track a certain number of faces within sight of the cameras viewfinder and then ensure that they are always in focus which can be highly useful in those smaller 'point &#038; shooter' cameras that don't offer much control over lens focusing.

Lastly, "pro-style" SLR cameras and lenses (where the camera body and lens are seperate and interchangable) have come down to a price that is within reach of the average consumer, so if you are particularly interested in capturing unique shots such as in macro-photography, you can get set-up with a decent camera body and proper macro-lens that will be especially suited to the job whilst not spending too much extra of your hard earned cash.

I will be writing a more comprehensive overview alongside my review aimed at those interested in getting into modern digital photography without breaking the bank.

Check back later this week for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very good questions Dmitry,</p>
<p>I am actually preparing a proper review of the digital camera that I use (FujiFilm F30) and it can indeed get good Macro shots.<br />
Without going into too much detail fo r the comments section,  I can tell you that the important features you should be looking for today in a digital camera are image stabilization and low light sensitivity (ISO, but be careful as some brands favor large ISO settings that produce a lot of noise in an image and then they apply excessive noise reduction processing in-camera which results in a &#8220;smeary&#8221; image that lacks detail).</p>
<p>Also another buzz word and &#8220;must have&#8221; function these days is &#8216;Face Detection&#8221;, a clever system whereby the camera can track a certain number of faces within sight of the cameras viewfinder and then ensure that they are always in focus which can be highly useful in those smaller &#8216;point &#038; shooter&#8217; cameras that don&#8217;t offer much control over lens focusing.</p>
<p>Lastly, &#8220;pro-style&#8221; SLR cameras and lenses (where the camera body and lens are seperate and interchangable) have come down to a price that is within reach of the average consumer, so if you are particularly interested in capturing unique shots such as in macro-photography, you can get set-up with a decent camera body and proper macro-lens that will be especially suited to the job whilst not spending too much extra of your hard earned cash.</p>
<p>I will be writing a more comprehensive overview alongside my review aimed at those interested in getting into modern digital photography without breaking the bank.</p>
<p>Check back later this week for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FujiFilm F30 - The Camera I Always Take With Me by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/fujifilm-f30-the-camera-i-always-take-with-me/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hmm.. I'm really clueless when it comes to professional photography. What are the key things to look for when buying a camera? I heard that megapixels aren't that important? If I was to take some really macro shots (e.g. insects) and want it to come out really crisp and high rez, would I need an expensive pro camera + lens - or can I get away with a higher end consumer offering? 

I'm thinking of getting a new camera but don't really wish to spend that much on the pro camera + lens since I don't really know much about it, so am steering towards lighter, sleeker, but high end consumer grade camera - do you think those would suffice for doing high rez macro shots, or is it a no go?

Sorry for turning this comment area into a QnA session :P Hope you can help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. I&#8217;m really clueless when it comes to professional photography. What are the key things to look for when buying a camera? I heard that megapixels aren&#8217;t that important? If I was to take some really macro shots (e.g. insects) and want it to come out really crisp and high rez, would I need an expensive pro camera + lens - or can I get away with a higher end consumer offering? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking of getting a new camera but don&#8217;t really wish to spend that much on the pro camera + lens since I don&#8217;t really know much about it, so am steering towards lighter, sleeker, but high end consumer grade camera - do you think those would suffice for doing high rez macro shots, or is it a no go?</p>
<p>Sorry for turning this comment area into a QnA session <img src='http://www.creativebump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> Hope you can help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creative Bump is Coming Soon&#8230; by Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/hello-world/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/hello-world/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Bookmarked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookmarked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creative Bump is Coming Soon&#8230; by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.creativebump.com/2007/09/21/hello-world/#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Can't wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
